Legal Updates

Legal Updates for Mar - 2022

疫情两年后,新加坡高等法庭对视频作证持何态度?ꟷꟷ 从新加坡高等法庭最近驳回外国证人以视频连线方式出庭作证请求一案谈起
在全球从新冠疫情逐渐复苏的环境下,新加坡高等法庭普通审判庭近期在 Wang Xiaopu v Koh Mui Lee and others [2022] SGHC 54 一案(“本案”)中针对海外证人申请通过视频连线的方式出庭作证这一问题作出了指导。需要注意的是,法庭强调,海外证人不应 “盲目” 以新冠疫情作为证人无法亲自到新加坡法庭参加庭审的理由。这是逐步回到 “常态” 的信号。

在这篇评论中,我们将探讨法庭在本案中的论述,以及本案对有意申请视频作证的海外证人的潜在影响。请点击这里阅读我们关于本案的中文评论。
31 Mar 2022 | Singapore

The Indonesian Government Mandates BPJS Membership to Buy Lands and Properties

Starting from 1 March 2022, property buyers have one more item on their to-do list when purchasing properties in Indonesia. Pursuant to Ministry of Land Affairs/National Land Agency Circular Letters (No. HR.02/153-400/II/2022, No. HR.02/164-400/II/2022, and No. 5/SE-400.HK.02/II/2022), buyers must have an active membership in the nation’s social security program or BPJS Kesehatan before they can register the right over land or apartment that they have purchased.

In doing so, the government aims to boost the implementation of BPJS Kesehatan and simultaneously enhance public access to quality healthcare. Thus, going forward, the Ministry of Land Affairs/National Land Agency will verify the status of an applicant’s membership in BPJS Kesehatan before registering any right over land, pending the implementation of an integrated system between the Ministry and BPJS Kesehatan.

31 Mar 2022 | Indonesia

Returning to the "Norm" – Singapore High Court Issues Guidance on the Giving of Evidence via Video-link amidst COVID-19 Pandemic
The General Division of the Singapore High Court in Wang Xiaopu v Koh Mui Lee and others [2022] SGHC 54 ("Wang Xiaopu") recently issued guidance on applications for overseas witnesses to give evidence via video-link in the context of the global recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Significantly, and as a signal of a return to the "norm", the Court cautioned against the "blind" citing of the COVID-19 pandemic as the reason why an overseas witness is unable to testify in person at trial before the Singapore courts.

In this Update, we explore the Court's reasoning in Wang Xiaopu as well as potential implications which litigants with overseas witnesses seeking to give evidence via video-link should be aware of. Please click here for our Update in English.
31 Mar 2022 | Singapore

Singapore Court of Appeal Settles Controversy on When a Grant of Security to Cover Existing Indebtedness May Amount to a Transaction at an Undervalue
Upon the insolvency of an individual or company, the Court has the power to set aside transactions at an undervalue entered into by the insolvent party when or as a consequence of which it becomes insolvent. In Rothstar Group Ltd v Leow Quek Shiong [2022] SGCA 25, the Singapore Court of Appeal conclusively ruled on two longstanding questions relating to the law of undervalued transactions. The first is whether the grant of fresh security by an insolvent party for its existing indebtedness can ever amount to an undervalued transaction. The Court held that it cannot. The second is whether there is a difference if the grant of fresh security by an insolvent party is for the existing indebtedness of a third party. The Court held that there is – in this situation, the grant of security could amount to an undervalued transaction.

The case involved applications to set aside a legal mortgage entered into by a company and its shareholder as security for moneys owed by an associated company. The Court of Appeal allowed the applications and discharged the legal mortgage with prospective effect. The applicants were represented by Lee Eng Beng SC, Sim Kwan Kiat, Chua Beng Chye, Raelene Pereira, Torsten Cheong, Wong Ye Yang, Yeoh Su Yi, and Foung Han Peow of Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP.
29 Mar 2022 | Singapore

Latest Guidelines on Personal Data Protection Notices under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (PDPA)

The Personal Data Protection Act 2010 ("PDPA") is the main legislation which regulates the processing of personal data in the context of commercial transactions. Pursuant to section 7 of the PDPA (the Notice and Choice Principle), every data user must prepare a written statement which sets out the information as prescribed under the PDPA.

In this regard, the Personal Data Protection Department (Jabatan Perlindungan Data Peribadi or "JPDP ") recently issued the Guide to Prepare Personal Data Protection Notice ("Guidance Note ") to provide guidance to all data users on the preparation of simple but comprehensive personal data protection notices (also known as "privacy notices "), which are aligned with the current business ecosystem as well as the personal data protection landscape in Malaysia.

Pursuant to the issuance of the Guidance Note, this Update seeks to provide a brief summary of the requirements for the preparation of privacy notices, as well as the potential impact on data users vis-à-vis their compliance with the Notice and Choice Principle.

 

29 Mar 2022 | Malaysia

Code of Conduct for Leasing of Qualifying Retail Premises (Updated 15 March 2022)
The Singapore Business Federation introduced a Code of Conduct for Leasing of Retail Premises in Singapore ("COC") on 26 March 2021. The COC was updated on 15 March 2022, with the amendments expected to take effect from 1 June 2022. The COC aims to provide a set of guidelines for landlords and tenants of Qualifying Retail Premises to enable a fair and balanced position in lease negotiation, and to provide such landlords and tenants with a governance framework to ensure compliance with an accessible dispute resolution framework.

This Update summarises the key features and principles of the COC, as well as the updates in the 15 March 2022 version.
29 Mar 2022 | Singapore

Ex Aequo et Bono: Applying Equity and Fairness under Indonesian Arbitration Law

Similar to most jurisdictions, Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution ("Indonesian Arbitration Law") recognises at least two types of decision that can be rendered by a tribunal. The first is a decision solely based on the four corners of contracts and the law (including the parties' contract), while the second is a decision based on the principles of equity and fairness, also known as ex aequo et bono.

The Indonesian Arbitration Law allows a tribunal to render a decision based on the ex aequo et bono principle, but only if the parties have agreed that the tribunal can do so. However, there has been a recent and worrying trend where arbitral tribunals have applied this principle without the parties' agreement.

In this article, we look into the statutory framework for the application of the ex aequo et bono principle, and how it has been applied in recent arbitrations.

Visit our Arbitration Asia website for insights from our thought leaders across Asia concerning arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, ranging from legal and case law developments to market updates and many more.

24 Mar 2022 | Indonesia

MAS Notices on Financial Measures Relating to Russia Sanctions: Impact on Financial Institutions in Singapore
On 14 March 2022, the Monetary Authority of Singapore ("MAS") issued two MAS Notices to all financial institutions ("FIs") in Singapore detailing the financial measures imposed by the Singapore Government against designated Russian banks, entities and activities in Russia and fund-raising activities benefiting the Russian government and related parties.
  1. Notice SNR-N01 Financial Measures in Relation to Russia ("MAS Notice SNR-N01") sets out the activities and transactions that FIs are prohibited from engaging in.
  2. Notice SNR-N02 Financial Measures in Relation to Russia – Non-prohibited Payments and Transactions ("MAS Notice SNR-N02") sets out payments and transactions that are excluded from the scope of the financial measures in MAS Notice SNR-N01.

Taking effect on 14 March 2022, the MAS Notice SNR-N01 and the MAS Notice SNR-N02 apply to all FIs, including all banks, finance companies, insurers, capital markets intermediaries, securities exchanges and payment service providers (including digital payment token service providers). Failure to comply with the requirements in the MAS Notices is an offence.

This Update highlights the impact of the MAS Notices on FIs, summarising the key prohibited transactions and relevant exclusions for FIs' noting and necessary action.

22 Mar 2022 | Singapore

Government Measures to Assist Economic Recovery under Resolution No. 43/2022/QH15 and Implementing Decree 15/2022/ND-CP: Keynotes and Implications

On 11 January 2022, Resolution No. 43/2022/QH15 on Fiscal and Monetary Policies for Supporting Socio-economic Recovery and Development Program ("Resolution No. 43/2022") was approved by the National Assembly of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

The objectives of Resolution No. 43/2022 are to stimulate the rapid recovery of production activities, prioritise certain sectors, and strive to achieve these goals set out in the 2021-2025 plans: (i) maintain an average GDP growth of 6.5-7% per year, ensuring public debt levels are lower than the allowable threshold permitted under Resolution No. 23/2021/QH15; (ii) restrict the urban unemployment rate to below 4%; and (iii) maintain a stable macroeconomic environment.

A number of policies have since been implemented to support the objectives of Resolution No. 43/2022. A combination of fiscal policies targeting a reduction of Value Added Tax ("VAT") rate in 2022 from 10% to 8% (i.e., a 2% reduction) with certain exclusions have been introduced. In addition, expenses relating to donations and sponsors in support of proactive COVID-19 efforts have been allowed to be included as deductible expenses for the purpose of calculating an enterprise’s taxable income in 2022. To implement these initiatives, Decree 15/2022/ND-CP ("Decree 15/2022") prescribing tax exemption and reduction came into force on 1 February 2022. It deals with VAT reduction on goods and services currently subject to 10% VAT (Article 1), and expenses from donations that are allowed to be deducted for purposes of determining taxable income (Article 2).

This Update provides the key features of Resolution No. 43/2022 and Decree 15/2022 and their implications.

22 Mar 2022 | Vietnam

Establishment of the Cambodia Competition Commission

On 17 February 2022, the Cambodia Competition Commission ("CCC") was established pursuant to the Royal Government of Cambodia’s Sub-Decree No. 37 ANKr.BK on the Organisation and Functioning of the Cambodia Competition Commission. CCC will be in charge of implementing the Law on Competition with the goal to help consumers access high quality, low price, and versatile products and services.

 In accordance with the Law on Competition which was enacted on 5 October 2021, CCC has been designated to be the competent authority to perform key activities including but not limited to receiving complaints in relation to competition.

 In this Update, we highlight the key aspects of CCC.

21 Mar 2022 | Cambodia

Determining the Extent of Inland Revenue Board’s Powers to Request for Disclosure of Personal Information: Genting Malaysia Berhad v Personal Data Protection Commissioner & Ors

Under the Income Tax Act 1967 ("ITA"), the Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia ("IRB") has broad powers and tools to ensure effective collection of tax revenue for the Malaysian government. This includes wide information gathering powers such as those provided for under Section 81 of the ITA which empowers the Director General of the IRB ("DGIR") to demand any person to disclose any information or particulars that is in the possession or control of the person for the purposes of the ITA.

The scope of the DGIR’s power to request information was recently tested in the case of Genting Malaysia Berhad v Personal Data Protection Commissioner & Ors (Case No. WA-25-83-02/2020), where the DGIR relied on Section 81 of the ITA to make a blanket demand for customers’ personal data from Genting Malaysia Berhad ("GMB"). The High Court in its decision ruled in favour of GMB and held that the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 ("PDPA") does not allow the DGIR to make such demands in view of the protection afforded to individuals by the PDPA over their personal data.

This Update therefore seeks to provide a summary and brief analysis of the High Court case, and examine the potential impact of the High Court’s decision on organisations carrying out personal data processing activities under the PDPA.

17 Mar 2022 | Malaysia

The Future of Security in Digital Spaces – What New Compliance Obligations Can Online Platforms and Businesses Expect?
At the 2022 Committee of Supply Debates, the Minister of Communications and Information, Mrs Josephine Teo, presented a speech setting out the priorities of the Ministry in governing and securing Singapore's digital spaces, and gave an indication of what changes and enhancements may be expected in the digital regulatory and compliance framework, including: (a) the introduction of Codes of Practice against harmful online content; (b) the review of the Cybersecurity Act and update to the Cybersecurity Code of Practice; and (c) the strengthening of data protection safeguards.

In this Update, we look at the proposed changes and initiatives in the above areas and the new compliance obligations that may be expected in the near future. We also explore how these changes may affect online platforms and businesses.
16 Mar 2022 | Singapore

SGX-Listed Issuers Must Review, Assess and Disclose Exposure or Nexus to Sanctions-Related Risks
The Singapore Exchange Regulation ("SGX RegCo") has issued a set of guidance notes on what an issuer should do if the issuer, or any person or entity closely associated with the issuer, is exposed to sanctions-related risks. An issuer refers to a company or other legal person or undertaking (including a real estate investment trust (REIT)) whose securities have been admitted to listing on the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (SGX-ST) or are the subject of an application for. The SGX RegCo guidance was issued following from an announcement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on 5 March 2022 which states that Singapore is imposing sanctions and restrictions against Russia in response to its invasion of Ukraine ("Russian Sanctions").

This Update provides a summary of the SGX RegCo guidance titled "Regulator's Column: What SGX expects of issuers in respect of sanctions-related risks, subject or activity" dated 7 March 2022 and distils the steps that an issuer has to take to comply with the SGX RegCo guidance with reference to the Russian Sanctions.
16 Mar 2022 | Singapore

Key Changes to Policies for Foreign Workforce, Lower-Wage Workers
As the economy recovers from the ravages of COVID-19, businesses are starting to increase their hiring. Against this backdrop, Minister of Manpower Dr Tan See Leng announced in his Committee of Supply 2022 speech on 4 March 2022 that Singapore would be making several key changes to strengthen the complementarity and diversity of its foreign workforce, as well as provide greater clarity and certainty to businesses on foreign workforce policies.

Apart from the Minister's speech, there have been other recent announcements by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) relating to Singapore's foreign workforce policies, as well as additional measures to advance the well-being of lower-wage workers.

In this Update, we cover the following developments:
  1. Changes to requirements for Employment Passes ("EP")
    1. Benchmarking of the minimum qualifying salary for EP holders; and
    2. Introduction of the new Complementarity Assessment Framework (COMPASS).
  2. Changes to requirements for S Passes
    1. Benchmarking of the cost of hiring an S Pass holder with reference to the qualifying salary and levy rates.
  3. Changes to restrictions in hiring foreign employees
    1. Updates to foreign workforce policies for the construction and process sectors, including phasing out the Man-Year Entitlement (MYE) framework;
    2. Introduction of the new Non-Traditional Source (NTS) Occupation List for the services and manufacturing sectors to allow businesses to hire S Pass holders on Work Permits; and
    3. Launch of the Manpower for Strategic Economic Priorities (M-SEP) scheme to allow qualifying firms some flexibility in hiring S Pass and Work Permit Holders ("WPHs").
  4. Other changes
    1. Enhanced coverage of mandatory medical insurance for S Pass and WPHs to better protect employers, who are liable for their employees' medical bills; and
    2. Introduction of the Progressive Wage Mark accreditation to support local lower-wage workers.
15 Mar 2022 | Singapore

Court Rejects Bank's Claim for the Recovery of Monies Paid Under a Letter of Credit on the Basis of Fraud
The recent collapse of major oil traders in Singapore has resulted in a slew of litigation proceedings commenced by banks seeking to recover monies paid to beneficiaries under letters of credit. In Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank, Singapore Branch v PPT Energy Trading Co Ltd [2022] SGHC(I) 1, the Singapore International Commercial Court upheld the independence principle in respect of letters of credit, applying a strict formulation of the fraud exception, i.e. that a bank is only entitled to refuse payment out under letters of credit where the beneficiary acts dishonestly, as opposed to recklessly, in the presentation of documents for payment.

The bank in this case had refused payment out under a letter of credit on the basis of fraud in the underlying round-tripping transactions. However, the Court found against the bank, finding that the beneficiary had not acted dishonestly, and was not required to make further queries regarding the transactions. This Update provides a summary of the decision and its implication on banks dealing with letters of credit and instances of suspected fraud.
15 Mar 2022 | Singapore

Singapore Court Issues First "Persons Unknown" Order in Decision Involving Cryptocurrency
The cryptocurrency market has grown exponentially, with a global market value of about $2 trillion, and yet, its regulation and legal status continue to be subject to much debate and uncertainty. Are cryptocurrency assets considered to be property in the eyes of the law? Where does one even begin to seek legal remedy for stolen cryptocurrency in the borderless nature and anonymity of the internet?

These were some of the novel issues before the Singapore High Court in CLM v CLN and ors [2022] SGHC 46. In this exceptional case, the Court granted the first reported freezing injunction against "persons unknown" in Singapore for S$9.6 million worth of cryptocurrency assets stolen from the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff was successfully represented by our Fraud, Asset Recovery and Investigations team, led by Danny Ong and Jansen Chow of Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP.
14 Mar 2022 | Singapore

New Simplified Track for Intellectual Property Litigation
The Ministry of Law ("MinLaw") has announced in a press release of 23 February 2022 that it will be implementing a new Supreme Court of Judicature (Intellectual Property) Rules 2022 ("new Rules"). The new Rules introduce (among other things) a simplified optional track for Intellectual Property litigation referred to as the "Simplified Process for Certain Intellectual Property Claims" ("Simplified Process").

The new Rules are expected to come into force on 1 April 2022. MinLaw has made available a draft version of the new Rules ("draft Rules") for interim reference, but the draft is subject to changes as it is currently undergoing the vetting process. This Update provides a brief summary of the Simplified Process as contained in the draft Rules.
11 Mar 2022 | Singapore

Bills of Lading Signed by or on Behalf of the Master – Is it an Owner's Bill or a Charterer's Bill?
The identity of the contractual carrier in a bill of lading contract is a matter of importance. A bill of lading issued by shipowners (i.e. an owner's bill) is preferable, as it allows a cargo claimant to arrest the vessel carrying the cargo, as opposed to a bill of lading issued by a voyage or time charterer of the vessel (i.e. a charterers' bill). It is common in international trade for bills of lading issued to state they are signed by or on behalf of the Master, without expressly stating the identity of the contractual carrier, and for such bills of lading to be treated as having been issued on behalf of the owner (or demise charterer) of the vessel. However, the position under PRC Law may not be as clear as it may first appear.

The Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China has issued a judgment (2016 Supreme Court Civil Application No 530) in which it held that a bill of lading issued on behalf of the Master, but which did not otherwise identify the carrier, should be treated as having been issued on behalf of the time charterers (and not the owners) of the vessel. This Update looks at the reasoning of the decision and assesses the impact of the decision under PRC law, and whether a cargo claimant seeking recourse under a bill of lading may be deprived of its right to arrest the carrying vessel before the PRC Courts.
11 Mar 2022 | Singapore

SGX RegCo's Expectations on Business Valuations & Disclosures
In the Regulator's Column on 1 March 2022, the Singapore Exchange Regulation sets out its expectations on valuations and what companies listed on the SGX-ST ("listed companies") must disclose about a valuation.

This Update highlights what listed companies and their boards of directors must be mindful of regarding business valuations of significant transactions and disclosures concerning valuations.
09 Mar 2022 | Singapore

Prakas on Cosmetic Distribution

On 24 February 2022, the Ministry of Commerce issued Prakas No. 0064 on the Requirements of the Cosmetic Distribution ("Prakas"), which came into force on the same day. The Prakas sets out the legal requirements to govern the distribution of cosmetics in Cambodia for the purpose of promoting fair competition, protection of health, and benefits to consumers.

In this Update, we highlight the key features of the Prakas.

09 Mar 2022 | Cambodia

MAS Issues New MAS AML/CFT Notice for Financial Institutions Dealing in PSMs, Various Revised AML/CFT Notices for Financial Institutions and Variable Capital Companies
To better address money laundering and terrorism financing risks in the financial sector, the Monetary Authority of Singapore ("MAS") has issued:
  • A new MAS Notice on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism ("AML/CFT") for financial institutions dealing in precious stones, precious metals and precious products ("PSM AML/CFT Notice"); and
  • Various revised MAS AML/CFT Notices applicable to FIs and variable capital companies,

collectively, "MAS AML/CFT Notices". The MAS AML/CFT Notices take effect on 1 March 2022.

The MAS AML/CFT Notices follow MAS' earlier consultation on this topic in July 2021. MAS also issued, on 1 March 2022, its Response to Feedback received on that consultation paper.

This Update briefly highlights some of the main features of the new PSM AML/CFT Notice, as well as some of the key new/revised AML/CFT requirements in various MAS AML/CFT Notices, such as: (a) the AML/CFT requirements relating to digital token services; (b) requirements relating to higher risk shell companies; (c) wire transfer and correspondent account requirements for credit card or charge card licensees; and (d) disclosure requirement for licensed trust companies and approved trustees.

09 Mar 2022 | Singapore

Bill Introduced to Regulate Certain Digital Token Service Providers, Harmonise and Enhance MAS Regulatory Power over FIs
The Financial Services and Markets Bill ("FSM Bill") was tabled in Parliament for First Reading to implement a financial sector-wide regulatory approach for financial services and markets. The FSM Bill will consolidate the provisions and powers that relate to the Monetary Authority of Singapore's regulatory oversight of different financial institution classes in a single Act.

The FSM Bill contains provisions on the following key areas:
  1. Regulation of certain digital token service providers created in Singapore for anti-money laundering and countering of financing of terrorism purposes;
  2. Harmonised power to impose requirements on technology risk management;
  3. Harmonised and expanded power to issue prohibition orders; and
  4. Statutory protection from liability for mediators, adjudicators and employees of an operator of an approved dispute resolution scheme.
This Update provides an overview of these key areas to be regulated under the FSM Bill.
08 Mar 2022 | Singapore

Singapore Announces Implementation of Sanctions Against Russia
On 5 March 2022, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a Press Release together with two annexed Factsheets setting out the details of the Singapore Government’s sanctions against Russia in response to its invasion of Ukraine. Broadly, the current and anticipated sanctions are as follows:
  1. A ban on the export, transit, and transhipment to Russia of strategic military and high technology goods which can be used for both commercial and military purposes; and
  2. Prohibitions imposed on financial institutions in Singapore against dealing with, among other things, four designated Russian banks as well as fund-raising activities benefiting the Russian government.

This Update highlights what exporters, shippers, financial institutions, issuers listed on the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (SGX-ST) and other organisations in Singapore should take note of in navigating the rapidly evolving legal and regulatory changes arising from the sanctions imposed by the Singapore Government and other jurisdictions against the Russian government, and its banks and related entities.

07 Mar 2022 | Singapore

Second Extension of Imposition of Penalty re: Application for E-Commerce Permit/License

On 3 March 2022, the Ministry of Commerce ("MOC") issued a Notification No. 0528 MOC.BRD on the Extension of the Imposition of Penalty in relation to the Application for E-Commerce Permit or License ("Notification").

Per the Notification, all individuals, sole proprietorships, legal entities and branch of foreign companies ("Relevant Persons") who carry out their business activities through electronic platforms have time until the end of June 2022 to apply for permits or licenses for E-Commerce. Relevant Persons who carry out e-commerce activities without a permit or license will be subject to pecuniary fines and the applicable penalties as determined by the Law on E-Commerce. MOC will implement the imposition of such pecuniary fine and penalties from 1 July 2022 onward.

04 Mar 2022 | Cambodia

An Employee's Breach of Fiduciary Duties and the Liability of Third Parties for Dishonest Assistance
When a company uncovers schemes perpetrated by one of its employees, a key question will be what recourse is available against the employee, and whether the company may also seek recourse against the employee's collaborators. This was the situation faced by the Singapore High Court in Sumifru Singapore Pte Ltd v Felix Santos Ishizuka [2022] SGHC 14.

The Court found that the 1st Defendant employee, in his role as shipping director and given his scope of functions, owed fiduciary duties to the Plaintiff employer, and had breached these duties by perpetrating various schemes against the interests of the Plaintiff. The Court further found the 2nd and 3rd Defendants, companies owned and controlled by the 1st Defendant, to be jointly and severally liable on the basis of dishonest assistance. The Plaintiff was successfully represented by Winston Kwek, Dedi Ahmad, Li Kun Hang and Dharini Ravi of Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP.
03 Mar 2022 | Singapore

English Court of Appeal Determines Who is an 'Operator' of a Vessel under the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976
In December 2021, the English Court of Appeal in Splitt Chartering APS & Ors v Saga Shipholding Norway AS & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 1880 handed down a judgment which provides clarification on the threshold which a claimant is required to meet to be considered an 'operator' of a vessel in the context of the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976 ("LLMC 76") as applicable under English law. The findings of the English Court of Appeal will be persuasive in the Singaporean context, where the LLMC 76 (with the 1996 Protocol) is likewise in force.

Additionally, this judgment highlights the importance of ensuring appropriate contractual arrangements between various business units in a group of companies that collectively manage or operate a vessel. While the purpose of the LLMC 76 is to encourage international trade by sea carriage, what this judgment indicates is also that the courts will be slow to apply an overly broad reading to the categories of parties entitled to limit their liabilities under the LLMC 76.
03 Mar 2022 | Singapore

Developments on Russian Sanctions: Russian Banks Banned from SWIFT by EU
On 2 March 2022, the EU announced another wave of new EU sanctions to be adopted – the exclusion of seven Russian banks from the SWIFT international payment system. This follows from the EU’s earlier sanctions on Russian individuals and entities, its ban on exports, as well as restrictions on the supply of various strategic goods and services, including items used in the oil refinery and high-tech sectors. This Update looks at the scope of the EU’s recent measures, and what parties should be mindful of, particularly in relation to relationships with Russian banks.
02 Mar 2022 | Singapore

And Never the Twain Shall Meet? - Nature and Extent of Overlap Necessary for a Litigation Case Management Stay in Favour of Arbitration
While litigation and arbitration are conceptually separate dispute resolution mechanisms, the Singapore Courts are empowered to order a case management stay of court proceedings in favour of either actual or anticipated arbitration proceedings in appropriate circumstances, and particularly where there is some or considerable overlap between the litigation and arbitration proceedings. In CJY v CJZ and others [2021] 5 SLR 569, the Singapore High Court considered and expounded upon how much of an overlap is sufficient, particularly as the court proceedings involved only one party to the arbitration (and five other non-parties to the arbitration).

The Court granted the stay of court proceedings sought by the First Defendant, demonstrating that a complete overlap is not required for the grant of a case management stay. The First Defendant was successfully represented by Gregory Vijayendran SC and Devathas Satianathan of Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP.
01 Mar 2022 | Singapore