Dispute over whether a cement silo qualifies as a “plant” for capital allowance purposes

Acted as lead counsel for Singapore Cement Manufacturing Co (Pte) Ltd in the Singapore High Court Case in a dispute with IRAS over whether a particular asset (a cement silo in this case) is considered a plant instead of a building for capital allowance purposes. The matter value amounted to approximately S$13 million.

Partner Vikna Rajah from the Tax Practice led the case.

Meet Our Team

Singapore, South Asia,
+65 6232 0597

Meet Our Team

Singapore, South Asia,
+65 6232 0597

Rajah & Tann Asia is a network of legal practices based in Asia.

Member firms are independently constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local legal requirements. Services provided by a member firm are governed by the terms of engagement between the member firm and the client.

This website is solely intended to provide general information and does not provide any advice or create any relationship, whether legally binding or otherwise. Rajah & Tann Asia and its member firms do not accept, and fully disclaim, responsibility for any loss or damage which may result from accessing or relying on this website.

© 2024 Rajah & Tann Asia. All Rights Reserved. All trademarks are property of their respective owners.