Modern day commercial transactions are typically executed by agents (usually, directors) on behalf of their principals. Where an agent’s act is not authorised by the principal, a valid ratification retrospectively authorises the agent to enter into the transaction. Yet ratification is not always a magic bullet. There are parameters to a principal’s power to ratify. Among others, can a principal ratify a contract in which it is expressly named as a party, even though it did not know about the contract at the time a litigation on the contract started?
The team of Gregory Vijayendran SC, Lester Chua and Tomoyuki Lewis Ban from Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP’s Commercial Litigation Practice Group successfully represented the respondents in resisting an appeal before Singapore’s apex court in Alternative Advisors Investments Pte Ltd v. Asidokona Mining Resources Pte Ltd anor [2024] SGCA 3. In this recent case, the dispute involved the issue of whether certain loan documents and deeds of assignment were valid, in circumstances where the purported principal was not aware of the agreements at the time the claim was initiated, and where the agent had not purported to act on the purported principal’s behalf when executing the agreements. The Court of Appeal held that the alleged ratification of the agreements was invalid.
The team from Rajah & Tann was instructed by M&A Law Corporation. This Update elucidates the key considerations that the Court of Appeal took into account in dismissing the appeal.
For more information, click here to read the full Legal Update.
Disclaimer
Rajah & Tann Asia is a network of member firms with local legal practices in Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. Our Asian network also includes our regional office in China as well as regional desks focused on Brunei, Japan and South Asia. Member firms are independently constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local requirements.
The contents of this publication are owned by Rajah & Tann Asia together with each of its member firms and are subject to all relevant protection (including but not limited to copyright protection) under the laws of each of the countries where the member firm operates and, through international treaties, other countries. No part of this publication may be reproduced, licensed, sold, published, transmitted, modified, adapted, publicly displayed, broadcast (including storage in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently for any purpose save as permitted herein) without the prior written permission of Rajah & Tann Asia or its respective member firms.
Please note also that whilst the information in this publication is correct to the best of our knowledge and belief at the time of writing, it is only intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be treated as legal advice or a substitute for specific professional advice for any particular course of action as such information may not suit your specific business and operational requirements. You should seek legal advice for your specific situation. In addition, the information in this publication does not create any relationship, whether legally binding or otherwise. Rajah & Tann Asia and its member firms do not accept, and fully disclaim, responsibility for any loss or damage which may result from accessing or relying on the information in this publication.
