The Indonesia Competition Commission (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha or “KPPU“) recently issued a press release (press release No. 94/KPPU-PR/XI/2024) highlighting its findings of potential anti-competitive practices in how state-owned enterprises (“SOEs“) procure goods and services. This practice, referred to as “SOE Synergy” or Sinergi BUMN, allows SOEs to directly appoint other SOEs or their affiliates for procurement contracts. The KPPU is concerned that this practice could lead to discriminatory practice or other types of abuse of dominant position by unfairly excluding private businesses from competing for SOE contracts, potentially reinforcing the already strong position of SOEs in certain markets. Although this practice is currently allowed under Article 155(2)(j) of the State-Owned Enterprises Ministry Regulation No. PER-2/MBU/3/2023 on the Guidelines for Governance and Significant Corporate Activities in SOEs (“SOE Regulation 2/2023“), the KPPU warns that it could lead to unfair competition and potential harm to consumers.
The KPPU is taking steps to address this concern. In the KPPU’s letter to the Ministry of SOE dated 25 October 2024, the KPPU strongly recommended removing the rule allowing direct appointments under “SOE Synergy” from the provider selection method in SOE procurement process. Specifically, the KPPU recommended that:
- The procurement of goods and services by SOEs through the direct appointment must adhere to competition principles.
- Article 155(2)(j) of SOE Regulation 2/2023 is to be removed.
- SOEs and their affiliates should consult with the KPPU before implementing “SOE Synergy”.
However, the Ministry of SOE has not yet responded to these recommendations, leaving the future of this procurement practice uncertain.
Key Takeaways
While the press release or the KPPU’s recommendation letter is not legally binding on the Ministry of SOE and will not automatically annul Article 155(2)(j) of SOE Regulation 2/2023, it provides an insight into the KPPU’s official stance on the implementation of “SOE Synergy”, particularly in the procurement process.
Noting that further clarity is required from the Ministry of SOE and/or the KPPU on how to proceed with “SOE Synergy” going forward, we recommend that SOEs review their current procurement practices, particularly those involving direct appointments through “SOE Synergy”, to ensure alignment with competition principles. The review should include a consideration of alternative direct appointment criteria outlined in Article 155(2) of SOE Regulation 2/2023 when engaging other SOEs or their affiliates. If none of the other criteria is feasible, we advise SOEs to consult with the KPPU before proceeding with direct appointment through “SOE Synergy” to ensure compliance and mitigate potential risks.
Disclaimer
Rajah & Tann Asia is a network of member firms with local legal practices in Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. Our Asian network also includes our regional office in China as well as regional desks focused on Brunei, Japan and South Asia. Member firms are independently constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local requirements.
The contents of this publication are owned by Rajah & Tann Asia together with each of its member firms and are subject to all relevant protection (including but not limited to copyright protection) under the laws of each of the countries where the member firm operates and, through international treaties, other countries. No part of this publication may be reproduced, licensed, sold, published, transmitted, modified, adapted, publicly displayed, broadcast (including storage in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently for any purpose save as permitted herein) without the prior written permission of Rajah & Tann Asia or its respective member firms.
Please note also that whilst the information in this publication is correct to the best of our knowledge and belief at the time of writing, it is only intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be treated as legal advice or a substitute for specific professional advice for any particular course of action as such information may not suit your specific business and operational requirements. You should seek legal advice for your specific situation. In addition, the information in this publication does not create any relationship, whether legally binding or otherwise. Rajah & Tann Asia and its member firms do not accept, and fully disclaim, responsibility for any loss or damage which may result from accessing or relying on the information in this publication.
